Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 06:10
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Microsoft will finally stop bugging Windows users about Edge — but only in Europe - The Verge
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
With Micah Parsons, the Cowboys foolishly drag their feet — again - NBC Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is it so hard to date nowadays?
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
How to take pictures of the Northern Lights with Google Pixel and other Android phones - 9to5Google
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Boston Red Sox rookie ‘revelation’ made ‘huge’ throw before walkoff - MassLive
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Scientists: We Built 'World's Smallest Violin' - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?